CWE-120
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
About
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common consequences
- Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability → Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
- Availability → Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Mitigations
- Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be w
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation
- Implementation: Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: - Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. - When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. - Check buffer boundaries if
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the
CVEs with this weakness
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-120?
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
How likely is CWE-120 to be exploited?
MITRE rates the likelihood of exploit for CWE-120 as high.
Which platforms does CWE-120 affect?
CWE-120 has been observed on: Memory-Unsafe, C, C++, Assembly.
How many CVEs does Rainforest track for CWE-120?
Rainforest Labs currently tracks 4 published CVEs mapped to CWE-120. They are listed on this page.
Empower Your Security Strategy with Rainforest
Discover vulnerabilities early, prioritize critical threats, and protect what truly matters. Rainforest streamlines your security operations, saving you time and reducing costs, so you can focus on what drives your business forward.
