CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
About
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common consequences
- Integrity → Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
- Availability → DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
- Other → Unexpected State
Mitigations
- Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be w
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation
- Implementation: Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: - Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. - When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. - Check buffer boundaries if acc
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Ex
- Operation: Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment. For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segm
CVEs with this weakness
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-787?
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Common consequences Integrity → Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands Availability → DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart Other → Unexpected State Mitigations Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
How likely is CWE-787 to be exploited?
MITRE rates the likelihood of exploit for CWE-787 as high.
Which platforms does CWE-787 affect?
CWE-787 has been observed on: Memory-Unsafe, C, C++, Assembly, ICS/OT.
How many CVEs does Rainforest track for CWE-787?
Rainforest Labs currently tracks 7 published CVEs mapped to CWE-787. They are listed on this page.
Empower Your Security Strategy with Rainforest
Discover vulnerabilities early, prioritize critical threats, and protect what truly matters. Rainforest streamlines your security operations, saving you time and reducing costs, so you can focus on what drives your business forward.
