CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
About
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Common consequences
- Availability → DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
- Integrity → Modify Memory
- Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control → Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
- Availability, Other → Alter Execution Logic, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
- Access Control → Bypass Protection Mechanism
Mitigations
- Requirements: Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
- Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
- Implementation: Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as
- Implementation: Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying represe
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the
CVEs with this weakness
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-190?
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
How likely is CWE-190 to be exploited?
MITRE rates the likelihood of exploit for CWE-190 as medium.
Which platforms does CWE-190 affect?
CWE-190 has been observed on: C, Not Technology-Specific.
How many CVEs does Rainforest track for CWE-190?
Rainforest Labs currently tracks 3 published CVEs mapped to CWE-190. They are listed on this page.
Empower Your Security Strategy with Rainforest
Discover vulnerabilities early, prioritize critical threats, and protect what truly matters. Rainforest streamlines your security operations, saving you time and reducing costs, so you can focus on what drives your business forward.
